We use cookies in order to improve the quality and usability of the HSE website. More information about the use of cookies is available here, and the regulations on processing personal data can be found here. By continuing to use the site, you hereby confirm that you have been informed of the use of cookies by the HSE website and agree with our rules for processing personal data. You may disable cookies in your browser settings.
Address: 101000, Moscow,
11 Myasnitskaya Ulitsa.
Phone: 8 (495) 772-95-90 *12349
Email: izangieva@hse.ru
The School of Sociology aims to train future social analysts in sociological reasoning to address the needs of social life, business, politics, public administration, and the media. To this end, the school works to develop a close link between education and research, as well as application-oriented education, internationalization of research and education, and close networks with major employers on the labour market.
Rozhdestvenskaya E., Isupova O.
Switzerland: Springer, 2024.
Fomicheva E., Jyrgalbek Jasmin, Mikhaylova O.
Digital Health. 2024.
Rozhdestvenskaya E., Isupova O.
In bk.: Biographical Perspectives on Lives Lived During Covid-19 Global Narratives and International Methodological Innovations. Switzerland: Springer, 2024. Ch. 7. P. 147-166.
OSF, 2024
Time: Monday 30 October, 18:10.
Venue: Myasnitskaya Ulitsa 11, Room 423.
If you need a pass to enter the building please contact Ekaterina Sokolova ksokolova@hse.ru
Abstract:
Based on long-term anthropological fieldwork, this paper analyzes urban governance as an assemblage of formal and informal practices. While many studies on urban governance see it as a highly formalized domain, this paper demonstrates how it is comprised of official procedures and personal favors, of legal frameworks and private arrangements between bureaucrats and residents. It draws on ethnographic research among community leaders and other residents of low income neighbourhoods in the city of Recife, in the Northeast of Brazil. These community leaders are active as political brokers, operating between the state and their fellow residents. They work on a wide variety of issues, ranging from slum upgrading, tenure security and poverty alleviation to cultural expression, gender equality and crime prevention. They claim to ‘speak for’ and ‘act on behalf of’ their fellow residents vis-à-vis the state, both within and outside of participatory programmes. Within participatory programmes, for instance, on land tenure and public services, the community leaders bring residents’ ideas into policy design, translate local meanings to bureaucratic categories, and vice versa. Outside of such programmes, they engage in personalized and often clientelist exchanges with bureaucrats and politicians. Especially when elections are approaching, they use their clientelist channels to negotiate the distribution of resources in return for political support.
This paper argues that the community leaders connect the institutional with the personal and the official with the unofficial. It presents them as connective agents in wider governance assemblages. These assemblages – amalgams of different government, citizen and corporate actors, institutions and resources – constitute temporary power structures that contain both formal and informal practices. The community leaders are key actors in bringing together and forging alignments between the different elements of the assemblage by both formal (e.g. participatory structures) and informal means (e.g. clientelist votes-for-favours exchanges). As special ‘assemblers’, they are a valuable starting point for analyzing urban governance as a formal/informal assemblage. In so doing, this paper contributes to recent debates on the informal dimension of urban governance and, more generally, the interconnections between the formal and the informal.