We use cookies in order to improve the quality and usability of the HSE website. More information about the use of cookies is available here, and the regulations on processing personal data can be found here. By continuing to use the site, you hereby confirm that you have been informed of the use of cookies by the HSE website and agree with our rules for processing personal data. You may disable cookies in your browser settings.
Address: 101000, Moscow,
11 Myasnitskaya Ulitsa.
Phone: 8 (495) 772-95-90 *12349
Email: izangieva@hse.ru
The School of Sociology aims to train future social analysts in sociological reasoning to address the needs of social life, business, politics, public administration, and the media. To this end, the school works to develop a close link between education and research, as well as application-oriented education, internationalization of research and education, and close networks with major employers on the labour market.
Abashkin V., Abdrakhmanova G., Vishnevskiy K. et al.
M.: National Research University Higher School of Economics, 2024.
Lomazzi V., Soboleva N.
Journal of Contemporary European Studies. 2024.
In bk.: Handbook of the Sociology of Morality, Volume 2. Springer, 2023. Ch. 14. P. 215-221.
Fabrykant M., Magun V., Милкова М. А.
SocArXiv. SocArXiv. SocArXiv, 2023
The School of Sociology invites you to the lecture of Dr. Maurizio Meloni (Department of Sociological Studies, Sheffield University, Sheffield, UK)
“The Transcendence of the Social: Durkheim, Weismann, and the Purification of Sociology”.
Time: Tuesday 30 May, 18:10.
Venue: Myasnitskaya Ulitsa 11, Room 422.
If you need a pass to enter the building please contact Ekaterina Sokolova ksokolova@hse.ru
Abstract: Building on Fox Keller’s acute genealogy of the nature–nurture opposition as located in a certain specific social, cultural, and political history in the late nineteenth century (2010), in this paper, I address a parallel problem: the making of a really modern (i.e., non-biological) sociology nearly at the same time as the “hard disjunction” (Keller, 2010) between heredity and the environment, nature and nurture, was made. I argue rather provocatively that traces of borrowing from hard heredity to sociology can be seen in Durkheim’s strategic usage of Weismann to destroy Lamarckian sociology. The transcendence of the social in Durkheim is entirely isomorphic to Weismann’s transcendence of the germ plasm: in both cases, they aimed to construct objective realities, radically independent and exterior from individual tendencies and peculiarities. Weismann offered Durkheim an important scientific companion to make boundaries between sociology and biology. In a Latourian sense (Latour, 1993), the purification strategy of Durkheim was actually helped by a hybridization with Weismann’s biology. In conclusion, by taking Weismann as an anticipator of the genetics revolution a few years later, I argue for a profound complicity between twentieth century non-biological sociology and genetics. They both made space for a neat distinction between biological heredity and sociocultural transmission, heredity, and heritage. If sociology and genetics thought of themselves as rivals and even enemies in explaining social facts, they should reconsider their positions.