We use cookies in order to improve the quality and usability of the HSE website. More information about the use of cookies is available here, and the regulations on processing personal data can be found here. By continuing to use the site, you hereby confirm that you have been informed of the use of cookies by the HSE website and agree with our rules for processing personal data. You may disable cookies in your browser settings.
Address:
101000, Moscow, Myasnitskaya str., 20, room 524; 525; 526
Phone: +7 (495) 772 9590 *12238
E-mail: nbelyaeva@hse.ru
We do believe that cutting-edge understanding of our country’s and the world’s future should and can be seen through public policy perspective, the policy of dialogue between different social and political groups, the policy that encourages the states' and public leaders’ accountability, open to expressed views of the public, analytical community, intellectuals and global citizens.
Boykoff J., Brownell S., Burke R. et al.
Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2019.
Dubrovsky D., Meyer I.
Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization. 2022. Vol. 30. No. 1. P. 169-176.
Roy Chowdhury A., Rajhans S. K.
In bk.: Theory, Policy, Practice: Development and Discontents in India. L.: Routledge, 2021. Ch. 6. P. 123-140.
Borisova E., Ivanov D.
BOFIT Discussion Papers. DP. Bank of Finland Institute for Economies in Transition, 2021. No. 9.
Theoretical assumption of close interaction between the concept of identity and the concept of citizenship is not accidental, as it is a result of development of ideas in modern theory of citizenship studies. Those ideas got a "second wind" with different evidences of globalization, with creation of multiple supranational institutions and communities, that are structuring both individual and group identities across national borders.
This leads to the fact that modern person can feel at the same time being a citizen of a particular country or region, work to restore the ecology of the rain forest in the other part of the world, be a member of the highly specialized professional community of global corporations and organize international actions in defense of prisoners of conscience as a "citizen of the world."
Though great variety of different communities, to which a modern person can belong, is providing lots of new opportunities, it also brings lots of challenges, as those communities are often based on different ethics, that may be in sharp conflict with each other.
What can modern education do to help a person to meet those challenges?
Nina Belyaeva assumes, that to build a culture of global citizenship we need more diverse system of global educational institutions. Her paper seeks to examine styles and formats of both formal and informal educational institutions, using cases of ERMA - European Master Program in Human Rights and Democratic Governance and NECE - Networking European Citizenship Education - and explors the possibility to combine of best practices of those formats by creating " joint learning spaces”.
The Full Text of the researh paper can be found here.
Belyeva_Workshop_ECPR 2015 (PDF, 734 Кб)